Examinando por Autor "Bardera Mora, R."

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Acceso Abierto
CFD Study of Flow Field Velocities and 3D Effects over the MEXICO Wind Turbine Model
(Science Publishin Group, 2017-12-13) Plaza Gallardo, B.; Bardera Mora, R.; Visiedo Martínez, S.
The deep understanding about wake field and 3D effects of wind turbines are still a challenge, due to the complexity of the three-dimensional flow which blades rotation produces. In this work an aerodynamic analysis about wind turbine model MEXICO is realized, firstly of axial distribution of velocities in several regions inside the streamtube and then some estimations of 3D effects, either lift coefficient augmentation or stall delay phenomenon. CFD-RANS simulations have been carried out at three different wind speeds, and results are compared to experimental data of the MEXICO project, from wind tunnel tests. Results show that axial and radial inductions are greater for outer sections and lower as wind speed increases, providing different wake configurations. As for the 3D effects, it is found that rotational augmentation appears firstly for inner part of the blade and they advance progressively towards span-wise direction as wind velocity grows. For inner section, at high wind speed, lift coefficient increase reaches to values of 50% over the corresponding 2D polar curve.
Restringido
Comparison of BEM and CFD results for MEXICO rotor aerodynamics
(Elsevier, 2015-07-07) Plaza Gallardo, B.; Bardera Mora, R.; Visiedo Martínez, S.
This work aims to conduct an aerodynamic analysis of the MEXICO wind turbine rotor, establishing comparisons between the results of two radically different computational techniques and measurements, obtained in wind tunnel tests under controlled conditions in the framework of the MEXICO project (Boorsma and Schepers, 2009, Schepers et al., 2012). Forces, pressures, and torque generated in the rotor are computed usingthe blade element momentum (BEM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes to investigate their main strengths and weaknesses at different wind speeds, highlighting the quality of the results obtained at different blade stations. In general terms, both methods tend to overestimate the spanwise distribution of forces and pressures. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS)-CFD simulations maintain a uniform level of accuracy across the studied velocity range, whereas BEM calculations outperform CFD estimates at low wind velocities but fail at higher velocities due to separated flow conditions. Blade tip loss and three-dimensional (3D) effects are partly responsible for inaccuracies in calculation, especially for the BEM code. These 3D effects are discussed briefly in relation to force estimates.